Israel claims success in the PR war, The Jewish Chronicle

While you're watching Israeli flaks on TV, or reading their crap in the paper, keep this article, penned by a sympathetic journal, obviously, firmly in mind.

Incidentally, one thing you can always depend on: scumbag PR whores will eventually brag (e.g., Wolfowitz bragging to Vanity Fair that Iraqi WMD was invented for bureaucratic reasons), and thus undermine their own lies.

Note bolded part below, among the rest of this truly amazing article. Yes, this invasion of Gaza was just cobbled together in retaliation against Hamas' post-truce rocket fire. Uh huh. Better control the messages just a tad more tightly next time, huh? Scum.

Israel claims success in the PR war

From The Jewish Chronicle
Anshel Pfeffer
December 31, 2008

Fewer military officers; more women; tightly controlled messages; and ministers kept on a short leash. This was Israel’s new media game-plan in Operation Cast Lead.

The Gaza attack is the first major demonstration of Israel’s total overhaul of its ‘hasbara’ operation following the Second Lebanon War. While the military aspects of the operation were meticulously planned, a new forum of press advisers was also established which has been working for the past six months on a PR strategy specifically geared to dealing with the media during warfare in Gaza.

“Whenever Israel is bombing, it is hard to explain our position to the world,” said Avi Pazner, Israel’s former ambassador to Italy and France, and one of the officials drafted in to present Israel’s case to the world media. “But at least this time everything was ready and in place.”

One of the decisions taken following Israel’s failure to explain its case during the Lebanon War was the formation of a National Information Directorate within the Prime Minister’s Office, tasked with coordinating the efforts of the press bureaus in the various government departments.

The Directorate, which has been up and running for eight months, began planning six months ago for a Gaza operation. A forum with representatives of the press offices of the Foreign and Defence ministries, the IDF Spokesman Unit and other agencies held numerous meetings to decide on the message.

The forum held two system-wide exercises in the past two months, one aimed at foreign media and, last week, one dedicated to the Israeli press.

“One of our lessons from the Lebanon War was that there were too many uniforms in the coverage,” says Yarden Vatikay, director of the National Information Directorate, “and that doesn’t come over very positively.”

The international media were directed to a press centre set up by the Foreign Ministry in Sderot itself so that foreign reporters would spend as much time as possible in the main civilian area affected by Hamas rockets. When the IDF was represented on the international TV networks, it was by Major Avital Leibovich to project a feminine and softer image.

Ministers have been ordered by the Cabinet Secretary not to give interviews without authorisation so as not to repeat the PR disaster of a year ago, when Deputy Defence Minister Matan Vilnai threatened the Palestinians with a “holocaust”.

So far, the two cabinet members without direct responsibility who have been most regularly interviewed have been Social Affairs Minister Yitzhak Herzog and Interior Security Minister Avi Dichter.

For the first time, sufficient numbers of spokespeople in a range of languages were appointed and briefed in advance. Mr Pazner gave close to 100 interviews in the first three days of the operation, in English, French, Spanish and Italian.

In his view, the toughest and most hostile questioning was “definitely by the Spanish interviewers, and also the French, especially the Canadian French”.

Israeli diplomats and spokespeople working with the British media have said that so far “most of the hostility has been in the print media, especially in The Guardian and The Independent. The electronic media, including also the BBC, have made more of an effort to seem even-handed.

“The coverage is definitely less hostile to Israel than what we saw during the Second Lebanon War two-and-a-half years ago.”

Both the Prime Minister’s Office and the Foreign Ministry ran monitoring services to view foreign media coverage and pass the results back to press officers to enable them to address the claims being put forward by reporters and Palestinian interviewees.

The months of preparation and the increased intensity of the media efforts have also shown results in Britain.

Senior diplomats in the London Embassy, headed by Ambassador Ron Prosor gave an unprecedented 25 interviews to national television and radio channels, in the first three days of the operation.


  1. So Israel was planning to invade Gaza (like they've started doing today) for six months? Please tell me why the first thing I think of when I think of this is that interview with Norman Finkelstein when he talks about how Israel was planning on going into Lebanon (like they did in 2006) as soon as they withdrew most of their troops from the south? Hmmmm.

    "Israel claims success in the PR war" - that's a joke, right? As far as I'm concerned, Israel is going to take a lot of shit for the destruction of Gaza. It's funny, because I look at the propaganda the pro-Israel side uses to "promote Israel" and all it's really just slander against Hamas ("oh Hamas' politics are so oppressive! You see, Israel is liberating the Palestinians from Hamas! So the air strikes and invasion are perfectly justified!" - bullshit). Pretty much nothing of what they say does portray Israel in a positive light in a logical way. Look at all the protests around the world. See how many people are out on the street protesting for Gaza. I now ask, how many are protesting for Israel outside of Israel and the USA?


Post a Comment

Popular Posts