Skip to main content

As Bush Admin Pushes $700B for Wall Street, Ralph Nader Asks, “Why Is There Need for a Bailout?”

Nader on Democracy Now! this morning....

More here:



Some excellent questions not really being asked on the Hill, even by Mr. Frank. As per usual, the Democrats will cave, having already conceded the terms of the argument, the framework of action, and their institutional rights and responsibilities. To say nothing of their responsibility to their constituencies.

As usual, the plan seems to be: let things fail, pin it on the GOP, gain power. As in Iraq, FISA, you name it.

I don't see Obama doing much of anything, either, except being "bipartisan."

Still doubt that we have a one-party state with two wings? I've been reading a lot in the business press, economists, etc. -- there is very little consensus that this plan, what is known about it, will work. Funny, that. Money for the financial services industry (ie, the rich); nothing for everyone else.

One criticism of the left (such as it is): there is no double standard in Bush's policies. The rich want protection from losses and freedom to profit: a rigged game. It was ever thus.

When, exactly, will the "pitchfork moment" occur?

And finally: will Americans finally grow up and realize that the government, structurally, is unconcerned about their "safety" or well-being? I mean, exactly how much information does a person need before they spit out the pacifier and see things for what they are? I don't mean pro forma rightwing "government is bad -- I use 'governance' now" -- except when we need it for the military, bailouts, to fight evil.... I mean waking up from the American Dream and attempting, finally, to complete the eighteenth century revolutions that launched this country.

Note that, confusions aside (and there are many), most "ordinary" people seem to get the point. The Friedman-worshiping crowd -- a very small percentage -- does not.

Right and left, most non-rich people (and many rich, actually) get the main point, derivatives aside: money buys power in our system, and he who pays the piper calls the tune. A child knows this to be the case; "adults" call it "cynicism."

Side note: Apparently, there's to be a demo on Wall Street today. Worth going to.

Welcome to 21st Century America: The New Brazil -- increasing inequality, decreasing rule of law (for the powerful), a Constitution approaching Soviet-style irrelevance (reads nice de jure; no one pays any attention de facto), with a bloated military junta in control. Except our ruling class is smarter, so we are more Augustan than most dictatorships: we maintain the forms and make sure that the haute bourgeoisie can maintain its lifestyle. If and when they begin to hurt enough to do anything, it may be too late to do anything about it. For now, as per usual, they have thrown in with the ruling class, which throws them some crumbs every so often.

So, it looks like worsening economic straights for most of us, increased militarism abroad and at home, disappearing civil liberties, and the usual ugly imperial implosion. To any reader of history: same old, same old. But this time, we may take the rest of the world down with us: a bankrupt, increasingly isolated superpower is a very dangerous animal. All it has is its armaments to throw around.

Domestically, as things worsen, there is always a toss-up between a left-wing and a right-wing (or, if you like, libertarian or authoritarian) revolution. We are ripe to the point of rotten for a new style of fascism here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

John Searle on Derrida

Makes a lot of sense to me. For what it's worth, I'm trying to struggle through Otobiographies; we'll see how that goes...but as far as I can tell, Searle is spot on.

Later: Twelve pages and four hours into Otiose-biographies, I gave up in disgust. If anyone reading this can explain the first twelve pages of this Derridiocy to me in plain English, I'd be both surprised and much obliged. Seriously.
Volume 30, Number 16 · October 27, 1983ReviewThe Word Turned Upside Down By John R. SearleJacques Derrida
(click for larger image)On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralismby Jonathan CullerCornell University Press, 307 pp., $8.95 (paper)1."Deconstruction" is the name of a currently influential movement in American literary criticism. The underlying theory was developed not by literary critics but by a French professor of philosophy, Jacques Derrida, and many of his ideas are in turn owing to Nietzsche and Heidegger. Culler writes as a disciple of Derr…

Gaza Shall Not Die! -- International Solidarity Day in Gaza, January 1, 2010

Hyperlink courtesy of yours truly; all else is Norm's. To see the graphic at the top of Norm's website, reproduced below, at full size, just click here. Please make this widely known.
The time is now to break the siege of Gaza.

Please see the announcement at the top of my web site.

Please spread the word! I hope you''ll join me on that historic day.

Noam Chomsky, "A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior" in Language, 35, No. 1 (1959), 26-58.

The original demolition of Skinner -- pretty entertaining to read!

Chomsky later pilloried Skinner further -- negative reinforcement? -- in the NYRB on the occasion of another, more popular (and frightening, from what I can glean) book of Skinner's, which I'll paste in below:
Volume 17, Number 11 · December 30, 1971The Case Against B.F. Skinner By Noam ChomskyBeyond Freedom and Dignityby B.F. SkinnerKnopf, 225 pp., $6.95IA century ago, a voice of British liberalism described the "Chinaman" as "an inferior race of malleable orientals."[1] During the same years, anthropology became professionalized as a discipline, "intimately associated with the rise of raciology."[2] Presented with the claims of nineteenth-century racist anthropology, a rational person will ask two sorts of questions: What is the scientific status of the claims? What social or ideological needs do they serve? The questions are logically independent, but the second type of question n…