The Racist Pigs in the White House Smear the Dead MLK, Jr
I guess because Trump's sexually threatened by the racist trope that blacks have bigger dicks? Who the hell knows what this spoiled-brat man-baby's needs stem from, but this is what the base loves.
They love it. They thrill to it. Just as they love this shit:
And that's why they love this shit, too.
These are not "bugs"; these are features. And if you're all, like, "But are you sure they know?" ask yourself this: do you give one tiny shit whether those who supported the Nazis arranged not to know what their Dear Leader was up to? No, you don't. Why the difference here?
I'll wait.
These people are scum, just like their Dear Leader who just released all this "data" and found some disgusting piece of shit to write it all up. No, it doesn't matter how nice they might have been to you. You think SS officers weren't charming at parties, didn't help their friends? Exactly how ignorant and willfully naive are you?
Anyway, these Trump-loving scum whine and cry like little brats, which is what they are, when you don't love them for their weaponized mental illness. Which is what this is; it's not "politics," it's weaponized mental illness. That's what fascism always is. See Camus, Orwell, Fromm, Reich, and everyone else on earth who ever wrote a line about the topic.
So, yes, total fucking cowards, many of them themselves abused if my personal experience with these people can be generalized (it can), who were privately scumbags now find the courage of their convictions because Man-Baby Dear Leader made it "OK" for them to embrace their inner Nazi.
Hey, guess what? I, too, was nontrivially abused. Badly. Yet somehow, I didn't come out the other end yearning to be a perp, to take revenge on the world, out of some still-undealt-with, Stockholm-syndrome-like, sadomasochistic desire to become the perpetrator, considering that "justice." I came out thinking, "No fucking way is anyone in my orbit going to get abused, by me or anyone else, if I can help it at all, and when I fall short, fuck ME for being a scumbag. Period."
It's a moral choice.
Try confronting one of these fucking scumbag Trump supporters on these obvious moral grounds. They react so tellingly; happened in my own little circle: DefCon 1-level self-righteous victimhood, gaslighting, and all the other pathetic arts of the moral coward and sadist (redundant, I know). I also know that one needn't be a Trump supporter to act this way; don't I know it, and first-hand. There are always cringing little scum who'll fuck any- and everyone over for their pathetically weak little egos.
My wife said one thing to one Trump-loving sibling: it's a character flaw. Correct. He cut her off, totally. Oh, he's soooooooo hurt, the little bitch. Fuck him -- and I won't even tell you what his retaliation was. It's beyond sick...and I entirely expected it, in general, if not, of course, in the specifics.
Interestingly, those Trumpers I actually know, almost to a person, have always acted like this -- in private. Treat people (over whom you have emotional and/or financial control) like total shit -- in private. Out in the world? Yes, sir! No, sir! Very good, sir! Even helpful -- to the "deserving." Slightly scared, somewhat submissive.
To power, that is.
No balls. No spine. No core. Just arrested-development adult-children who never pulled up their pants and did the basic work of self-confrontation. Absolute hypocrites who are literally un-American, in the best sense of what America actually means. But we're the "traitors."
And weak. Oh, god--so fucking weak. That's why they worship this fragile pussy-grabbing monster in the White House, who runs around constantly telling everyone how strong, smart, brave, wonderfully ethical he is. They love it: "Great, now I can be the soulless shitbag I actually am and want to be, and I can claim moral superiority, too! That's how I'll get back at the Daddy I both worship and hate!"
Which is why if you dare call them on it at all, they'll go utterly ballistic on you. Tantrums.
So, don't you try, because Uncle Racist Loser might gwab his wittle bwanky and cwy about how MEANS you are, you fascist, racist, hate-filled hater who's a racist fascist filled with hate! [Cries. Both means it and at the doublethinkingly same time is peeking through fingers to see if it's working.]
And that'd be a tragedy, right?
A taste:
Read.
They love it. They thrill to it. Just as they love this shit:
Immigrants in U.S. detention centers were punished with solitary confinement for unproven disciplinary violations, and then kept locked in isolation for 24 hours a day, with little access to outdoor recreation or even showers, according to a scathing new report from a government watchdog.
The report, dated June 3, describes surprise inspections conducted by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General of four detention centers overseen by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) between May and November of last year.
Inspectors identified “immediate risks or egregious violations” of solitary confinement standards at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center, in California, and the Essex County Correctional Facility, in New Jersey. A third detention center in Aurora, Colorado, used solitary confinement in ways that “infringed on detainee rights,” the report said.
The detention centers were also cited for a host of other violations, including dangerous handling of food and unsanitary conditions.
The inspector general report comes less than two weeks after the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and its partners released an extensive investigation into U.S. immigration authorities’ misuse and overuse of solitary confinement.
And that's why they love this shit, too.
These are not "bugs"; these are features. And if you're all, like, "But are you sure they know?" ask yourself this: do you give one tiny shit whether those who supported the Nazis arranged not to know what their Dear Leader was up to? No, you don't. Why the difference here?
I'll wait.
These people are scum, just like their Dear Leader who just released all this "data" and found some disgusting piece of shit to write it all up. No, it doesn't matter how nice they might have been to you. You think SS officers weren't charming at parties, didn't help their friends? Exactly how ignorant and willfully naive are you?
Anyway, these Trump-loving scum whine and cry like little brats, which is what they are, when you don't love them for their weaponized mental illness. Which is what this is; it's not "politics," it's weaponized mental illness. That's what fascism always is. See Camus, Orwell, Fromm, Reich, and everyone else on earth who ever wrote a line about the topic.
So, yes, total fucking cowards, many of them themselves abused if my personal experience with these people can be generalized (it can), who were privately scumbags now find the courage of their convictions because Man-Baby Dear Leader made it "OK" for them to embrace their inner Nazi.
Hey, guess what? I, too, was nontrivially abused. Badly. Yet somehow, I didn't come out the other end yearning to be a perp, to take revenge on the world, out of some still-undealt-with, Stockholm-syndrome-like, sadomasochistic desire to become the perpetrator, considering that "justice." I came out thinking, "No fucking way is anyone in my orbit going to get abused, by me or anyone else, if I can help it at all, and when I fall short, fuck ME for being a scumbag. Period."
It's a moral choice.
Try confronting one of these fucking scumbag Trump supporters on these obvious moral grounds. They react so tellingly; happened in my own little circle: DefCon 1-level self-righteous victimhood, gaslighting, and all the other pathetic arts of the moral coward and sadist (redundant, I know). I also know that one needn't be a Trump supporter to act this way; don't I know it, and first-hand. There are always cringing little scum who'll fuck any- and everyone over for their pathetically weak little egos.
My wife said one thing to one Trump-loving sibling: it's a character flaw. Correct. He cut her off, totally. Oh, he's soooooooo hurt, the little bitch. Fuck him -- and I won't even tell you what his retaliation was. It's beyond sick...and I entirely expected it, in general, if not, of course, in the specifics.
Interestingly, those Trumpers I actually know, almost to a person, have always acted like this -- in private. Treat people (over whom you have emotional and/or financial control) like total shit -- in private. Out in the world? Yes, sir! No, sir! Very good, sir! Even helpful -- to the "deserving." Slightly scared, somewhat submissive.
To power, that is.
No balls. No spine. No core. Just arrested-development adult-children who never pulled up their pants and did the basic work of self-confrontation. Absolute hypocrites who are literally un-American, in the best sense of what America actually means. But we're the "traitors."
And weak. Oh, god--so fucking weak. That's why they worship this fragile pussy-grabbing monster in the White House, who runs around constantly telling everyone how strong, smart, brave, wonderfully ethical he is. They love it: "Great, now I can be the soulless shitbag I actually am and want to be, and I can claim moral superiority, too! That's how I'll get back at the Daddy I both worship and hate!"
Which is why if you dare call them on it at all, they'll go utterly ballistic on you. Tantrums.
So, don't you try, because Uncle Racist Loser might gwab his wittle bwanky and cwy about how MEANS you are, you fascist, racist, hate-filled hater who's a racist fascist filled with hate! [Cries. Both means it and at the doublethinkingly same time is peeking through fingers to see if it's working.]
And that'd be a tragedy, right?
A taste:
Summary
J. Edgar Hoover is laughing in his grave today. After wielding the power of the FBI in a systematic effort to destroy Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Hoover died knowing that every reputable newspaper and magazine reporter and editor in America had refused to publish the manufactured garbage he and his agents peddled in files, memos and audiotapes that were collected in a ruthless domestic surveillance program that is one of the most shameful episodes of 20th century American history. The journalists refused to publish stories based on the so-called evidence surreptitiously provided to them by FBI agents because they understood full well that the files and tapes circulated by Hoover’s FBI failed to meet the most basic, minimal standards of evidence; that any such “evidence” had been fatally tainted by bias, racism, and “dirty tricks” that were akin to those utilized by the secret police of an authoritarian state; and that Hoover was attempting use them for political purposes.
The journalists and editors who refused to publish hit jobs on Dr. King based on the FBI “information” were entirely correct in their analysis. The 1979 Report of the House Select Committee on Assassinations determined that the FBI’s campaign against Dr. King “grossly abused and exceeded its legal authority and failed to consider the possibility that actions threatening bodily harm to Dr. King might be encouraged by the program,” that the FBI investigation violated the constitutional rights of Dr. King and colleagues associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and was “very probably felonious.”
Today, a British magazine called Standpoint published an article by David Garrow in which he gathers all of the dirt he could find from FBI files newly released by order of President Trump and presents them without even the most minimally necessary historical context, evidentiary scrutiny, or critical assessment of the biased nature of the sources. Nothing is new in this article except one incendiary claim: that Dr. King witnessed an alleged rape, and that that Dr. King allegedly “looked on, laughed and offered advice.” This claim is based entirely on a handwritten note scribbled in the margins of a document, in an obvious effort to embellish the salacious nature of what had been typed. Garrow had offered the article to a number of reputable media platforms in the United States, each of which turned him down. They refused to publish Garrow’s article for exactly the same reason that all reputable journalists in the United States refused to take the bait offered to them by Hoover and his agents during the 1960s: because the so-called evidence assembled to put forth claims fails to meet even minimal journalistic standards.
I read Garrow’s article with great sadness. Over the course of many decades, Garrow wrote and published books and articles notable for their high standard of quality and critical inquiry, qualities of professionalism that have been entirely abandoned in the Standpoint article. I do not understand why Garrow has forsaken the reputation for scholarly integrity and moral character to vindicate Hoover’s campaign of manufactured lies and character assassination against Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. I believe it is a personal tragedy for him. I can only hope and pray that Garrow’s article does not achieve its declared goals, which would be an untold tragedy for all of us.
I worked with Dr. King day in and day out throughout the civil rights struggle beginning in 1960. Martin King was my friend, and I loved him as a brother. I write the following response because he is not alive to respond or defend himself. Martin King was the person with the greatest moral integrity and human decency I have ever met. His legacy in the nonviolent struggle for social justice and peace is more important now than ever before. It is the moral obligation of all of us to sustain and further the work Dr. King began, and to refuse to allow his legacy to be tarnished by lies and falsehoods that were manufactured by a racist FBI campaign that sought only to destroy him and the black freedom movement in which he was a such an inspiring leader.