Skip to main content

The Green Light | Phillippe Sands on the Torture Team at the White House in Vanity Fair

I think we can now fully dispense with the "a few bad apples" argument, which was transparent bullshit as soon as it was said.

The most amazing part of this article, to me, is that, apparently, the sadists at Gitmo were literally getting ideas from the fucking television program, 24. I kid you not.

Of course, there is yet more proof in this article of two obvious points: the Bush admin should be indicted about a thousand times over, and Doug Feith truly is, as Tommy Franks put it, "the fucking stupidest guy on the planet," as well as a fascist.

Check out the author on Democracy Now!, currently playing live. They'll archive it here.

In this article, (Scott) Horton grinds the Yoo (and here, too); the book's coming out soon.

And here's Yoo's memo, one in a series, courtesy of the Washington Post, which seems to have finally gone vertebrate:
Have a nice time in prison, pal. Of course, he'll be pardoned -- if any charges are ever brought (don't hold your breath). Last time he'll ever leave the US, that's for sure: he'll get picked up under international law, and rightly so.

At the very least, this professor of law at Berkeley (but Norman Finkelstein shouldn't be teaching anywhere?) should be fired.

Finally, here's Rumsfeld's jaunty comment on another torture memo (click to enlarge):

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

John Searle on Derrida

Makes a lot of sense to me. For what it's worth, I'm trying to struggle through Otobiographies; we'll see how that goes...but as far as I can tell, Searle is spot on.

Later: Twelve pages and four hours into Otiose-biographies, I gave up in disgust. If anyone reading this can explain the first twelve pages of this Derridiocy to me in plain English, I'd be both surprised and much obliged. Seriously.
Volume 30, Number 16 · October 27, 1983ReviewThe Word Turned Upside Down By John R. SearleJacques Derrida
(click for larger image)On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralismby Jonathan CullerCornell University Press, 307 pp., $8.95 (paper)1."Deconstruction" is the name of a currently influential movement in American literary criticism. The underlying theory was developed not by literary critics but by a French professor of philosophy, Jacques Derrida, and many of his ideas are in turn owing to Nietzsche and Heidegger. Culler writes as a disciple of Derr…

Gaza Shall Not Die! -- International Solidarity Day in Gaza, January 1, 2010

Hyperlink courtesy of yours truly; all else is Norm's. To see the graphic at the top of Norm's website, reproduced below, at full size, just click here. Please make this widely known.
The time is now to break the siege of Gaza.

Please see the announcement at the top of my web site.

Please spread the word! I hope you''ll join me on that historic day.

Noam Chomsky, "A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior" in Language, 35, No. 1 (1959), 26-58.

The original demolition of Skinner -- pretty entertaining to read!

Chomsky later pilloried Skinner further -- negative reinforcement? -- in the NYRB on the occasion of another, more popular (and frightening, from what I can glean) book of Skinner's, which I'll paste in below:
Volume 17, Number 11 · December 30, 1971The Case Against B.F. Skinner By Noam ChomskyBeyond Freedom and Dignityby B.F. SkinnerKnopf, 225 pp., $6.95IA century ago, a voice of British liberalism described the "Chinaman" as "an inferior race of malleable orientals."[1] During the same years, anthropology became professionalized as a discipline, "intimately associated with the rise of raciology."[2] Presented with the claims of nineteenth-century racist anthropology, a rational person will ask two sorts of questions: What is the scientific status of the claims? What social or ideological needs do they serve? The questions are logically independent, but the second type of question n…